The narcissistic tangerine tinted teletubby, " I would love to meet, and kiss the ass of the North Korean dictator's he's a very smart man". Why does this fool love throwing praises on Dictators.
@ 10 months ago
Killeen, TX 76543, USA
It's part of a deliberate strategy to obtain cooperation. He figures maybe we can avoid a war by dealing with them instead of the cold shoulder treatment. I'm not judging and that's not my opinion. WaPo did a piece on this.
@ 10 months ago
Lakeland, MN 55043, USA
just imagine if 44 said it would be a honor to meet the brutal dictator, conservative would go haywire.
@ 10 months ago
@ 10 months ago
even so b, you have to admit that the previous strategy of "we just won't deal with [evil despot dictator X]" hasn't worked out well...plus globalization has made the world very small and close. I'm not opposed to trying a different tack.
I'm not completely sure the slimy used-car salesman tactic of liberally applying empty compliments is the best way, but it's certainly an interesting strategy from 50,000 feet: realizing that political purity in our snowflake-y eyes isn't reality, we
need to put aside some things and work with others for important, global common good goals, such as avoiding getting ourselves blown the fúck up.
Really! That hermit wants the attention, and the minority of the American voting public put the wrong small minded egotistical maniac in the Oval office. His draft dodging cowardly ass, can't wait to show how tough he is with someone else's
love one's. This fool going to lead us into Nuclear Holocaust.
I thought the same (not exactly the same but you know what I mean) about Reagan's tactics with Russia. Then I had to admit I was wrong.
Now Reagan, who was not a very smart guy, looks pretty brilliant in retrospect.
If we do nothing, as we have been, b, do you suppose U.S. soil could be bombed once this asshóle figures out how to deliver a payload that far away?
Because I tend to think Kim would do that if he could. So now that the time is getting near, what do you propose we do to stop it?
Complaining is easy. What would be a solution?
No, what do you mean do nothing, ever POTUS has none everything possible beside threaten nuclear war like this fool. It is lways easy to pound your chest and scream military option when you don't have no skin in the game.
No president yet has addressed NK nuclear threat head on. I'm not sure what you mean by "everything possible" unless it's "talk a lot and take no action."
So what is your opposed solution, b? If POTUS is wrong, what should he do differently? I'm not being sarcastic. I don't have an answer to that question, except to say that Obama's so-called "strategy" only allowed the monster to get bigger.
I'm not a POTUS fan, you know that, but here's the thing. If our nut job and their nut job can develop a mutual respect for their shared brand of crazy, then I'm on board. If it keeps that jackwad from blowing us up, great.
And maybe he'll decide to take his penis size issues out on Syria instead!
I need to clarify the above by saying, I meant Kim.
We have got to get the People's Repiglet over to Mar-a-Lago and give him some chocolate cake and some premium prime rib well done with ketchup. Invite Dennis Rodman too. Menage a trois!
They'll all be hard for a month, even BLOATUS.
This is what I called Forest Gumping our way to a better outcome, but if it works it works. Maybe it'll be Trump's biggest success.
@ 10 months ago
Midtown, New York, NY
Stupid is as stupid does
@ 10 months ago
Please explain how North Korea got bigger, they're still the same hermit country seeking attention. The draft dodger in oval office in trying to appease his and Kim's ego. He starting to realize sanctions and negotiation is the best policy like
the President before him.
So, no ideas from you, b? I get it, complaining is so easy.
How did NK get "bigger"??? I think the answer is "almost reaching the goal of having a real ICBM."
That what the orange face buffoon what you to believe. Sanctions are having a cribbing affect on this hermit nation. Are you willing to go fight or send your love one's to satisfy someone bravado. This is a sovereign country regardless.
I agree about the sovereign nation stuff, but I do believe the ICBM stuff too as they've been progressing steadily for many years. Are you saying we should wait for NK to actually use one before we do something?
You seem to advocate staying the former course. That will work, until it doesn't. And then it's too late. So I am basically in Drew's camp on this; plus idiot vs. idiot may work better. Less intimidating, you know?
The best solution is to allow China to depose of the current North Korean regime and insert their own governing body
@ 10 months ago
Villa Park, IL, USA
There's a possible benefit to Trump's unpredictability with regards to all these dictators, before they could count on the US responding an exact way. But Trumpy doesn't seem to have that set response
Bubba's plan worked out well. https://youtu.be/6TcbU5jAavw
If Trump is unpredictable but has a long term strategy then tactical changes less dangerous as they would be purposeful.
If no long term strategy exists then he's just playing craps with taxpayer money.
I also think Japan needs some of it's military shackles removed, a revised constitution perhaps.
Yeah, do that and before you know it they're flying planes into ships again and invading China
I feel like they've outgrown that
Lol, I think so
Still no responses, are you all willing to go fight or send your love one's off to war. That's the only option you seem to believe is left. Sanctions are working. You stated NK is bigger, imagine them without the sanctions. They would have
bigger plastic weapon on display.
Maybe we should send them a pallet of $100 bills
If it was their's in the first place, why not send two. Maybe you perfer the Russians paying our tangerine repubic.
If owed a man $100 but knew he would use that money to buy a gun to use against your best interests... Would you pay him?
Yes, if you owe them, pay them. You weren't worry about your best interest, when you took the $100.
obama is getting involved in the French election but it seems that the MSM is ok with that. I am sure bhippie agrees but what about everyone else?
President Not Sure
@ 10 months ago
Wright City, MO, USA
Russia already been involved, do more research before talking nonsense. it becuse people like you this nation has that orange draft dodging pos in white house. His Russian built house of card is crumbing "bigly".
what about the money obama gave to bibis opponent? BTW: which fruit best describes your skin tone? I would like to be accurate when commenting to you.
What about the 4 billion dollar welfare check, and the new air defense system that President Obama gave the ungraceful occuppiers of Palestinian's homeland. I notice you haven't heard a peep from Netanyahu about the Iran deal.
The tone of your Lord and Savior Jesus Christ a man that hid out in Egypt a country in Africa, or the tone of biblical description feet like bronze and hair white like lamb wool.
ok I guess I will go with avacado skin or rotten banana.
So you worship rotten banana with avocado skin, that explains your ignorant ass voting for that tangerine tinted draft dodging incompetent pos coward.
I am talking about you, you 3rd grade spelling rotten banana tinted dumb-åss.
Whaa! i voted for a incoherent tangerine tinted teletubby looking buffoon, and everyday he show how effing stupid i was for that vote. Thanks with your backwood Ozark racist, misogynistic mentality. Has taken this country back a 100 years.
now that's new, bmoron comparing himself to god.
@ 10 months ago
Spotsylvania, VA 22553, USA
That's why hysteria you need to stay in hibernation, you have awoken with more unfounded nonsense. No where in my statement did i mention GOD. I can't help you've been brainwashed with that fake ass European depiction of Jesus.
The hair on his head was white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
Revelation 1:14 NIV
His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
Revelation 1:15 NIV
That definitely not the depiction showing him as a blue eye, brown hair, caucasian. Thanks for validating my statement.
@AMI - Who wrote Revelations and how might that affect the way Jesus was depicted?
It wasn't depicting a black man either Bhaven, it was the risen Jesus as
Skal, at the heart of your question is if John had simply made this up or if he actually had a vision.
If you believe he simply made it up then it doesn't matter
If you believe he had a vision then he would obviously use items common to his time to best describe what he saw
And which historical John actually was the author. It likely wasn't the Apostle, as you know.
If he saw a black man, he would say "and the Son of Man appeared to me as a descendant of Cush,"
Really a man name John living in the Northern Africa and Middle East region of world. When the letter J wasn't even invented. Didn't Jesus hideout in Egypt, isn't Egypt a country in African, a country of people of color, before the Europeans.
The John in question was on Patmos, one of the islands in the Aegean
(clueless on this debate)
Northwest Harbor, NY 11937, USA
How do you know that, your cultural conditioning tells you that's the only outcome possible Ami. Egyptians stated the Jews left people of color, came back caucasian Europeans.
Bhaven, if you want to believe Jesus was black, more power to you. The only pertinent issue is if you believe His words.
All I know Coptic Christian from Egypt are known as the first followers of Christianity. The vast majority of their depictions are not of a blue eye, European looking Virgin Mary or Jesus. His words or King James?
Bhaven, Jesus' race while he was walking on Earth is of no importance to me.
Does your skin look like bronze glowing in a furnace? I highly doubt it.
Yes it is. if it wasn't you wouldn't be trying to prove otherwise. Just having the knowledge of the region alone, tell you he was a person of color.
There are many many texts from hundreds of years before King James that show via textual criticism incredible consistency from the early work of scribes to the printing press
Your KJV argument holds zero water
And you also clearly have no idea what glowing hot bronze looks like
And you clearly don't understand the the author was not describing the human Jesus
Still doesn't take away the fact he was from middle east, and hideout in Egypt in his human form. Sorry Moses didn't look like Charleston Heston, and Jesus didn't look like Jeffery Hunter.
I don't care
It clearly matters to you because, you're still talking about it.
Anyway, he was a guy, who lived in a place, at some time in history. From all accounts, an awesome dude. Too bad we're not all the same general color, but who gives a shít.
Exactly Doc, that's all I'm saying
Bhaven clearly can't grasp that the "wool, bronze" verse that he and many like to use was a vision of a supernatural being and not a specific ethnicity
Focusing on the wrong details in a narrow minded, self serving way
That's your opinion ami, b has his. You can't really say he's wrong. It's the bible for crying out loud. As many interpretations of those verses as there are people that read them, if you know what I mean.
But aslong as you continue the myth of the blue eye, blonde hair, caucasian, everything is fine and people are being open minded. Just more cultural conditioning BS.
How many people interpret the bible for self serving purposes? Cherry pick? Whole religious ideologies are based on such stuff. Come on.
@bhaven - Jesus was clearly a Swede.
The vast majority of Christians don't believe he looked like that
It's not an opinion Doc, I took the actual verse and provided actual pictures
Yes, @Skal born in the Middle East. @Ami, the actual manuscript or someones interpretation.
You're the one who used the verse in the first place, so you tell me
bronze and wool alone infer not of caucasian descent. It doesn't matter but you're still talking about it. If it doesn't matter only his words, try taking down the caucasian looking Jesus in your church, and replacing it with a person of color.
I just realized you live in a world of your own delusion, maybe I should have sooner. Likely not your fault, I'm sorry
Actual pictures, ami? That's pretty fúcking amazing. Or do you mean, someone's picture they drew interpreting something on the bible? Wouldn't that also be an opinion?
"Wool" could be a description of texture not color, for example. Couldn't it? Just sayin.
Yes, Doc, actual pictures of bronze in a furnace and white wool. Not hard to find
Now eyes like fire and a voice like rushing waters are more challenging, but those never get referenced
Wool was the texture of his hair.
I have seem plenty picture with his eye like fire, and wool texture looking hair. Maybe not in the misguided rendition you grewup seeing. How many African-Americans would lose faith if he was a person of color.
I don't get why the race of Jesus matters, but then I'm not a Jesus person so what do I know.
it only matters when you state he not a blue eye, brown hair, caucasian. If it doesn't matter the ethnicity of Jesus, why not display a picture of a person born in the North Africa/middle east region of the world.